Abstract Overview
Background: Investigators from low-, middle-, and high-income countries representing all inhabited continents contributed to the development of the Global Adolescent and Child Physical Activity Questionnaire’ (GAC-PAQ). The GAC-PAQ addresses multiple gaps in global physical activity (PA) surveillance (e.g., omission of some PA domains, insufficient cultural adaptation, underrepresentation of rural areas in questionnaire validation studies).
Purpose: To assess the comprehensibility of the GAC-PAQ among 7- to 17-year-olds and one of their parents/guardians.
Methods: Child-parent dyads from 15 countries (N=250) participated in a cognitive interview. Structured by PA domain (i.e., school, chores, work/volunteering, transport, free time, outdoor time), interviews were conducted in 13 different languages to enhance inclusivity. Participants were asked about the clarity of the questions and response options and encouraged to provide suggestions to facilitate completion of the questionnaire. Images were included to help participants in answering questions about PA intensity.
Results: In general, participants found the questionnaire to be comprehensive. Adolescents found it easier than children to answer the questions. Several children struggled to answer questions about the duration of recess and lunch periods, the intensity of activities, and/or concepts related to income, travel modes, active trips, and organized activities. Many parents were unsure about the frequency, duration, and intensity of their children’s PA at school, and/or recommended using more culturally-relevant images. Some participants misunderstood the concept of activities that “make you stronger” (intended to assess resistance activities) and/or struggled to differentiate between work, volunteering, and chores.
Conclusions: Participants’ feedback was used to develop a revised, simplified, and culturally-relevant GAC-PAQ, which will be pilot-tested in an app that will include country-specific images and narration. Further research is needed to assess the reliability and validity of the revised GAC-PAQ.
Practical implications: Findings have implications for the development of PA questionnaires and PA surveillance.
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Additional Authors