Free-time physical activity, mental health, and quality of life in Brazil’s Primary Health Care users

Restricted Access

You must be a registered user to view this page. Please select from one of the options below.

Avatar	Reviewer	Topics	Settings	Study Types	Total Reviews
Reviewer	Alejandra Jáuregui Chair of the Department for Physical Activity and Healthy Lifestyles Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Mexico	Implementation science 24 hours Inequalities	School Community Transport	Epidemiology Intervention Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	17 16 –
Reviewer	Ales Gaba Associate Professor Palacky University Olomouc Czechia	24 hours Monitoring and data systems Other (please specify)	School Healthcare Not Applicable	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	22 6 –
Reviewer	Antoine Noel Racine Associate professor Université Côte d’Azur France	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Economics Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Community Sport Healthcare Whole System	Intervention Economic evaluation Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	14 19 –
Reviewer	Armando G. Olvera Profesor investigador de tiempo completo Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México Mexico	Implementation science Inequalities Monitoring and data systems	School Transport Whole System	Epidemiology Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	17 11 –
Coordinator	Aurélie Van Hoye Professor Université de Lorraine France	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Community Sport Whole System	Intervention Method development Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	27 8 –
Reviewer	Cesar Hernandez-Alcaraz Posdoctoral Student Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Afghanistan	24 hours Mental Health Inequalities	Community Family Whole System	Epidemiology Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	14 16 –
Reviewer	Charlotte Lund Rasmussen Research Fellow Curtin University Australia	24 hours Inequalities Monitoring and data systems	School Workplace Sport	Epidemiology Method development Measurement or surveillance	23 9 –
Reviewer	Citlali González-Alvarez Research INSP Mexico	24 hours Inequalities Other (please specify)	School Healthcare Not Applicable	Epidemiology Practice Other	11 17 –
Reviewer	Corneel Vandelanotte Professor Central Queensland University Australia	24 hours New Technology Other (please specify)	Workplace Community Not Applicable	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Other	18 10 –
Reviewer	Dawn Tladi Senior Lecturer University of Botswana Botswana				6 18 –
Reviewer	Elroy Aguiar Assistant Professor in Exercise Science The University of Alabama United States	24 hours New Technology Monitoring and data systems	School Workplace Community	Epidemiology Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance	23 12 –
Reviewer	Eugen Resendiz Postdoctoral Scholar INSTITUTO TECNOLOGICO Y DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES DE MONTERREY Mexico	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems Other (please specify)	Community Transport Whole System	Epidemiology Method development Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	15 12 –
Reviewer	Eugene Fitzhugh Associate Professor University of Tennessee, Knoxville United States	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Monitoring and data systems	School Workplace Community	Epidemiology Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	16 16 –
Reviewer	Eun-Young Lee Assistant Professor Queen’s University Canada	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	School Family Transport Whole System	Epidemiology Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	12 12 –
Reviewer	Fernanda Gabler Teaching Assistant University of Glasgow United Kingdom	24 hours New Technology Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Community Family Healthcare	Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance	10 17 –
Reviewer	Fitria Dwi Andriyani Lecturer Yogyakarta State University Indonesia	24 hours Mental Health New Technology Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	School Community Family	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	6 15 –
Reviewer	Gaonyadiwe George Mokone Senior Lecturer University of Botswana Botswana	Implementation science New Technology Other (please specify)	School Sport Healthcare	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	15 12 –
Reviewer	Gaonyadiwe Lubinda-Sinombe lecturer University of Botswana Botswana	Implementation science Mental Health Inequalities	Workplace Community Healthcare	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Other	–
Reviewer	Gemma Ryde Lecturer University of Glasgow United Kingdom	Implementation science Mental Health Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Workplace Community Healthcare	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	18 11 –
Reviewer	George Nassis Associate Professor United Arab Emirates University United Arab Emirates	Implementation science New Technology Monitoring and data systems	Community Sport Whole System	Intervention Economic evaluation Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	–
Reviewer	Gregore Mielke Senior Lecturer School of Public Health, The University of Queensland Australia	24 hours Economics Inequalities	Community Sport Family Healthcare	Epidemiology Method development Measurement or surveillance	12 16 –
Reviewer	Harriet Koorts Associate Professor Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University Australia	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Inequalities	School Community Whole System	Intervention Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	21 10 –
Reviewer	Jacqueline Mair Senior Scientist Singapore-ETH Centre Singapore	Implementation science 24 hours New Technology	Workplace Community Family Not Applicable	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Other	13 14 –
Reviewer	Jamile Codogno Associate Professor Sao Paulo State University Brazil	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Economics Monitoring and data systems	Community Sport Healthcare	Intervention Economic evaluation Measurement or surveillance	12 12 –
Coordinator	Jasper Schipperijn Professor University of Southern Denmark Denmark	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science 24 hours New Technology Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	School Community Transport Whole System	Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	47 13 –
Reviewer	Jenny Veitch Professor Deakin University Australia	Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Other (please specify)	Community Family Transport	Epidemiology Intervention Practice	2 7 –
Reviewer	Jiani Ma Research Fellow Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University Australia	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Other (please specify)	School Community Whole System	Epidemiology Intervention Practice	15 12 –
Reviewer	Joey Murphy Lecturer in Physical Activity and Public Health University of Bristol United Kingdom	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Mental Health Other (please specify)	Community Sport Whole System	Epidemiology Method development Measurement or surveillance	13 11 –
Reviewer	Jonathan Cagas Associate Professor University of the Philippines Diliman Philippines	Mental Health Inequalities Other (please specify)	School Community Sport	Measurement or surveillance Practice Other	11 15 –
Reviewer	JOYCE NDABI DR university of dar es salaam Tanzania	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Mental Health Monitoring and data systems	School Community Whole System	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	14 13 –
Reviewer	Julissa Ortiz Brunel Early career researcher Universidad de Guadalajara	24 hours Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Other (please specify)	School Community Transport	Epidemiology Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance	11 19 –
Reviewer	Kathia Larissa Quevedo Researcher National Institute of Public Health Mexico	Implementation science 24 hours New Technology Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	School Community Sport	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	14 14 –
Reviewer	Katrina Messiha Marie Skłodowska–Curie PhD fellow Amsterdam UMC Netherlands	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Inequalities	Community Healthcare Whole System	Method development Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	11 13 –
Reviewer	Kim Straun Lecturer in Child Health, Nutrition and Physical Activity University of Bristol	Implementation science 24 hours New Technology	School Family Healthcare	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Practice	9 19 –
Reviewer	Lauren McCaffrey Marie Curie PhD Fellow Glasgow Caledonian University United Kingdom	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Mental Health Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Workplace Community Healthcare	Intervention Practice Other	14 16 –
Reviewer	Leigh Vanderloo Scientific Director ParticipACTION Canada	Implementation science 24 hours Mental Health Other (please specify)	School Sport Family	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	14 12 –
Reviewer	Louise de Lannoy Executive Director Outdoor Play Canada Canada	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Community Sport Whole System	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	22 5 –
Reviewer	Malebogo Monnaatsie Lecturer University of Botswana Botswana	Implementation science 24 hours New Technology	School Workplace Healthcare	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	14 14 –
Reviewer	Marla Frances Mallari Department Chair University of the Philippines/College of Human Kinetics Philippines	Implementation science Monitoring and data systems Other (please specify)	School Sport Healthcare	Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance	13 19 –
Reviewer	Matthew Ahmadi Research Fellow University of Sydney Australia	24 hours New Technology Monitoring and data systems	School Community Healthcare	Epidemiology Method development Measurement or surveillance	13 18 –
Reviewer	Maxime Luiggi Maître de conférences Aix-Marseille University France	Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	School Sport Not Applicable	Epidemiology Measurement or surveillance Other	9 20 –
Reviewer	Mumtaz Meeran Senior Specialist Abu Dhabi Public Health Centre United Arab Emirates	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Mental Health Inequalities	Workplace Community Healthcare	Intervention Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	13 14 –
Reviewer	Nur Dania Rosaini PhD Student University of Glasgow United Kingdom	Mental Health Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	Community Sport Family Healthcare	Intervention Method development Measurement or surveillance Practice	13 13 –
Reviewer	Olivier Riquier Postdoctoral researcher Université Côte d’Azur France	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs	Community Healthcare Whole System	Method development Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	9 16 –
Reviewer	Reginald Ocansey Professor University of Ghana, Legon Ghana Ghana	Mental Health Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	School Sport Family Healthcare	Intervention Measurement or surveillance Practice	8 19 –
Reviewer	Salomé Aubert Vice President Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance (AHKGA)	Inequalities Co-benefits/ non-health benefits/ SDGs Monitoring and data systems	School Community Whole System	Method development Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	18 13 –
Reviewer	Sarah Edney Senior Research Fellow National University of Singapore Sierra Leone	Implementation science Mental Health New Technology	Community Whole System Not Applicable	Epidemiology Intervention Method development	8 17 –
Reviewer	Sarah Kennedy Senior Lecturer, Sport, Health and Physical Education Western Sydney University Australia	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Other (please specify)	School Sport Family	Intervention Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	7 22 –
Reviewer	Sitong Chen Dr Victoria University Australia	24 hours Mental Health Economics Monitoring and data systems	School Community Transport Whole System	Epidemiology Economic evaluation Measurement or surveillance Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development)	11 16 –
Reviewer	Taru Manyanga Assistant Professor University of Northern British Columbia Canada	24 hours Mental Health Inequalities	School Community Healthcare	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	13 13 –
Reviewer	Thibaut Derigny Lecturer (MCF) Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour France	24 hours New Technology Monitoring and data systems	School Sport Transport	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance	6 20 –
Coordinator	Tony Baker Managing Director Tecology Consulting Group Brazil				–
Reviewer	Tracy Kolbe-Alexander Professor University of Southern Queensland Australia	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Implementation science Inequalities	Community Transport Whole System	Intervention Policy (e.g. policy or guideline development) Practice	16 14 –
Reviewer	Yves Palad Associate Professor University of the Philippines Philippines	Systems / cross-sector partnerships Inequalities Monitoring and data systems	School Community Family Healthcare	Epidemiology Intervention Measurement or surveillance Practice	11 14 –

Please note: All abstracts are to be submitted in English. A lead author can submit a maximum of 2 abstracts. They may also be named on other abstracts as an additional author or presenter.

Communications: All communication regarding receipt and notice of your abstract will be via email. Please refer to our key dates page for important deadlines. Notifications will be sent on or before the dates specified there. An automated email will be sent with a unique Abstract ID. Please use this number in any communications. If you need to withdraw an abstract submission, please do so using the ‘Withdraw’ option on your Abstract dashboard.

Final Abstract Format: In an effort to accommodate as many presenters as possible, ISPAH has implemented a policy where only one abstract per author is selected for an oral or short-oral presentation. Those whose submissions are not included in the oral or short-oral sessions will have the opportunity to participate as poster presenters.

The final format of your abstract has been detailed in your abstract outcome email. Details can also be viewed on your Abstract dashboard.

Important Note: The short-oral format is a late addition to the programme. On the user dashboard we are not able to change the ‘labelling’ on any e-poster that has been changed to a Short-Oral. All Short -Orals and physical posters will continue to say E-poster on the dashboard. Please be sure to look at the session type to be sure whether you should prepare a short oral or a hard-copy poster.

Important Note: The presenting author MUST be registered for the Congress and is responsible for the registration fees (and accommodation and travel costs where applicable). If there is a change in the presenting author, please notify the Organizing Committee by sending an email via our helpdesk form in your abstracts dashboard no later than August 26, 2024.

If the presenting author of a standard Oral or Short- Oral presentation is not registered by August 26, the submission will be removed from the programme.

Guidelines for Oral and E-poster abstracts

Abstracts must not exceed 300 words, including headings (excluding title or authors) following the structured format (headings) as closely as possible, as shown below.

The title should be no longer than 15 words.

The body of the abstract should be structured using the following headings:

Research Abstracts

Background:

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Practical implications:

Funding:

Practice/Policy Abstracts

Background:

Program Delivery or Policy Components:

Evaluation:

Conclusions:

Practical implications:

Funding:

Guidelines for Symposia abstracts

Regular Symposium

The regular symposia will have a Chair who will provide a short introduction/background on a specific topic followed by 3-5 presenters, followed by a discussion actively involving the audience, often led by a discussant or a moderator. The chair can act as discussant or moderator, if the chair is not one of the presenters.

Title: The title should represent the overall topic (max 15 words)

Purpose: State the primary purpose of this symposium.

Description: Include an overall symposium description

Chair (Name and Affiliation):

Presenter 1 (Name and Affiliation):

Presenter 2 (Name and Affiliation):

Presenter 3 (Name and Affiliation):

Discussant/moderator (Name and Affiliation):

After the overall abstract for the symposium, the chair will need to include the individual abstracts for each presenter. Each presenter should prepare an individual abstract following the same format as the oral and E-poster abstracts (see above).

Debate Symposium

The debate symposia will have a Chair or Moderator who will provide an introduction on a specific controversial topic. This will be followed by affirmative and opposing presenters (1 or 2 for each side), who will provide arguments “for” and “against” the debate topic area. Each side should present their initial stance, which will be followed by a rebuttal from each side. If there are two presenters for each side, one presenter should provide the initial presentation while the other should present the rebuttal. This will be followed by a 30-minute discussion.

Title: The title should represent the topic area and its controversial nature.

Purpose: A statement of the purpose of the debate, emphasizing what is innovative about the topic (including a brief description of the topic)

Rationale: Why is this topic worthy of addressing at this conference and why this is a debatable topic?

Chair (Name and Affiliation): Introduction to Debate

Affirmative Presentation(s) [Name(s) and Affiliation(s)]: Title and short description

Opposing Presentation(s) [Name(s) and Affiliation(s)]: Title and short description

Alternate view Presentation [optional] [Name(s) and Affiliation(s)]: Title and short description

Conclusions or Outcomes: Identify the key anticipated conclusions or outcomes from this innovative debate.

Guidelines for workshop abstracts

The workshop objectives should support participants in the development of skills and knowledge in an innovative area of interest.

Abstracts for workshops should be no longer than 300 words (not including authors or title) and follow the guidelines below as closely as possible. The title should be brief, no more than 15 words.

Title: The title should represent the overall topic area being discussed.

Purpose: State the primary purpose of the workshop.

Learning Objectives: Include an overall workshop description along with the key learning objectives (ideally at least three learning objectives). The learning objectives should be written with an action verb describing what the participant will learn or be able to do upon the completion of the workshop.

Learning Objective 1: Please include short description

Learning Objective 2: Please include short description

Learning Objective 3: Please include short description

Target Audience: Include a brief summary of the target audience for this workshop.

Organization and Method of Presentation: Include a brief summary of the main topics/ideas that will be discussed and the method of presentation/discussion (e.g., practical application of techniques, small group discussion, co-creation, sharing circles, case studies and demonstration, problem-solving) to accommodate different learning styles.

ISPAH congress – abstract review instructions

Scoring of abstracts

We have tried to keep the review process simple with a 5-star scoring system for 5 questions:

Contribution to the congress theme (see https://congress2024.ispah.org/congress-theme/ for more information)
Originality/Novelty (it is clear what this abstract contributes to the field?)
Quality of the work (are the methods well-described and conclusions sound?)
Overall abstract clarity and key message (is it clear what message the authors are sending?)
Practical implications for policy and/or practice (how ‘useful’ is the work for the real world of physical activity promotion?)

You will make our work of selecting the best abstracts for an oral presentation easier by using the whole scale. I.e. don’t feel bad to only give 1 or 2 stars if you think a certain aspect of the abstract is not great.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion

The ISPAH Congress is a global congress, and abstracts should be assessed keeping in mind that ISPAH encourages diversity and inclusion and that research opportunities are not equal across countries.

For example, large scale RCT studies with device-based measures of physical activity are rarely possible in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, whereas a ‘simple cross-sectional survey’ might be very novel, with a large impact, if no data existed beforehand.

Presentation type

After scoring, you can select the presentation type (oral, e-poster or oral/e-poster) you suggest. We will have space for 200-250 oral presentations (i.e. only 20-25% of submissions), so only suggest an oral presentation for those abstracts that really impressed you. The other accepted abstracts will be offered an E-poster. Suggest ‘reject’ only for those abstracts you feel are outside the main scope (see below).

Main scope of the ISPAH 2024 congress

As you probably are aware, ISPAH congresses focus primarily on public health, health promotion, and physical activity as a health enhancing tool (e.g. exercise as medicine). ISPAH is not a sports medicine congress, so studies on athletes’ performance or injury recovery are not a priority, but can be relevant if they have clearly stated implications for the general population.

COVID-19 related abstracts

To be considered for an oral presentation, abstracts focusing on COVID-19 need to have a clear ‘lessons learnt’ for the post-pandemic situation.

Unable to review an assigned abstract – conflict of interest

We tried to assign abstracts to reviewers based on your preferences, but this was a manual process (we need an AI-tool for this) and the fit with your expertise will not always be perfect. It is also likely that we have overlooked co-authorships for some abstracts.

If you have been allocated an abstract that you really are not able to assess, or if you have a conflict of interest, please contact us by selecting the ‘Contact Coordinators’ button on the Abstract and selecting ‘Conflict of Interest’. Please include some details of the conflict for the abstract you cannot review, and we will re-assign it.

What should you consider a conflict of interest?

If you are a co-author on the abstract
If you are actively collaborating with one or more of the author(s) on similar work.

Working with (or having worked with) one or more of the authors on an unrelated project is not a conflict of interest.

Restricted Access

Delegate Media Consent