Abstract Overview
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic-related confinements lead to a global increment in sedentary behavior(SB). However, excessive SB (≥960minutes/day) has been linked with adverse mental health outcomes. Although evidence suggests a relationship between SB and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-DSM-V), changes in SB during the pandemic and GAD risk in university students remains unclear.
Purpose: Our aims were to explore changes in SB and GAD risk across the pandemic in an Irish university and investigate how much SB was associated with GAD risk.
Methods: Data from a repeated measures cross-sectional electronic survey(annual:2019-2022) were analyzed. Measures included SB(IPAQ-SF), GAD(PDSQ) and demographic questions. After post-stratification weighting, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests compared differences in SB(minutes) and anxiety scores(1-10) with iteration year. SB and GAD were dichotomized into high/low risk based on standardized criteria(SB≥960mins=high: GAD≥7=high). Logistic regression was conducted determining the overall association between SB and GAD risk, adjusting for demographics.
Results: The final sample (N=3221) were aged {mean(SD)}21.7(6.5) years with 50.5%(N=1628) identifying as female. Most were undergraduates (89%,N=2872) of middle socio-economic status (SES:43%,N=865). Results from one-way ANOVAs indicated statistically significant differences in SB and GAD across iterations. Tukey HSD results highlighted significant increases in SB between 2019(M=379.4, SD=156.3) and both 2020(M=486.6,SD=195,p<.001) and 2021(M=439.3, SD=192.1, p<.001). Similarly, GAD risk was significantly higher in 2020(M=5.6,SD=3.4,p<.001) and 2021(M=5.3,SD=3.7,p=.047) compared with 2019(M=4.8,SD=3.4), with no statistically significant differences in 2022. Results from the final regression model revealed that high SB levels(OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.65) and lower SES levels(OR .60, CI .46-.78) were associated with greater GAD risk.
Conclusion: SB and GAD risk were significantly higher during the pandemic confinements. The results emphasize targeting SB and SES in GAD prevention interventions.
Practical implications: While pandemic confinements are lifted, effect may still be present. This may be of interest to policymakers and health-care professionals.
Funding: University of Limerick
Additional Authors