A tale of two regional cities: Assessing council policies for active living, transport and recreation


Oral

Abstract Overview

Background:
The degree to which council policies incorporate evidence-based recommendations for creating environments supportive of physical activity is unknown.

Purpose:
To determine how closely council policies align with evidence-based recommendations for creating activity-supportive environments.

Methods:
This case study is part of a larger research project exploring physical activity related policies of Australian councils. A validated survey was distributed to 250 purposively selected councils, yielding 57 responses from 52 councils. Two regional Queensland councils were chosen for a case study based on demographic similarities.

A verified scoring system assessed policies against evidence-based indicators, with ‘policy presence’ evaluated on a scale of present (1), partial (0.5), or absence (0). ‘Policy quality’ was determined based on standards and targets (e.g., >80% of residences <400m from parks), with scores ranging from ‘no policy / specificity’ (0) to ‘specific standards/aims with measurable targets’ (3). Multiplier scores were applied where policies were either ‘mixed/partially inconsistent’ (-0.5) or ‘inconsistent’ (-1) with evidence-based recommendations. Summary scores quantified overall presence and quality of council policies.

Results:
While both councils demonstrated high levels of policy presence associated with activity-supportive environments (Council 1: 78%; Council 2: 87%), overall policy quality was relatively low (Council 1: 26%; Council 2: 38%). This was predominantly due to a lack of evidence-based standards and targets within multiple domains. Several policies not aligned with evidence-based recommendations within multiple domains also contributed to low policy quality. Both councils shared policy deficiencies related to health impact assessments, tree canopy cover, walking/cycling targets, access to large parks and daily destinations, street connectivity, dwelling density, and policy performance monitoring.

Conclusions:
Despite strong policy presence, policy quality requires strengthening across multiple domains.

Practical implications:
Council policies require strengthening predominantly through the introduction of explicitly defined standards and targets that are evidence-based to improve physical activity.

Funding:
This research received no funding.

Additional Authors

Name: Anthony Kimpton
Affiliation: School of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no
Name: Paula Grant
Affiliation: School of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no
Name: Tracy Kolbe-Alexander
Affiliation: School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no

Delegate Media Consent

ISPAH respects your privacy and is committed to using event photographs and videos responsibly. We capture media to showcase the value of our activities through various channels, such as our website, social media, and newsletters. Please review the consent details below, with the option to opt out at any time. If you would like to know more about how ISPAH responsibly manages your privacy please view our Privacy Statement.

Purpose: ISPAH would like to capture photographs and videos during the workshops for promotional and communication purposes, including sharing content on our website, social media, newsletters, and other related materials.

Usage:

  • Photographs and videos may be edited and used in ISPAH publications, promotional materials, and online.
  • Your personal details (e.g., name, affiliation) will not be shared unless explicitly consented to in a separate agreement.

Opt-Out Option: You have the right to opt out at any time. Please notify the photographer or videographer at the event, and we will ensure that no images or videos of you are used

Confirmation *