The devil’s in the detail: Unpacking Australian council policies for active living, transport and recreation


E-poster

Abstract Overview

Background:
Limited understanding exists regarding evidence-based policies within local government (LG) promoting environments supportive of physical activity (PA).

Purpose:
To determine the presence of LG policies and broadly assess their alignment with evidence-based recommendations for promoting activity-supportive environments.

Methods:
Australian councils (n=250) with cities or towns exceeding 10,000 residents were sent a survey investigating governance, transport, urban planning, liveability and other PA-related policies. Participants responded (yes/no) to indicate policy presence and had the option of providing additional comments. The survey aimed to identify the presence of policies supportive of activity-friendly environments. Data analysis comparing responses to evidence-based recommendations revealed their broad alignment with the evidence-base.

Results:
Fifty-seven responses were received from 52 councils (20.8%) across six Australian states. Most prioritised health, wellbeing or active communities (96.5%). Social inclusion was also a common policy focus (68.4%). However, few prioritised health impact assessments for urban planning (17.5%) and transport (14%) projects, or low-cost PA programs (21.1%).

Creating liveable communities (84.2%) and ensuring access to parks (82.5%) were strong focus areas, but only half prioritised access to daily destinations and dwelling densities (56.1%). Key related concepts such as ‘20-minute neighbourhoods’ (22.8%) were also less prominent.

Most prioritised walking (87.7%) and cycling (70.2%), but only half prioritised provision of cycling (56.1%) and walking (49.1%) infrastructure. Public transport (28.1%) and access requirements (22.8%), and walking (21.8%) and cycling (15.8%) participation targets were less common, and only one had public transport usage targets.

Conclusions:
Many councils prioritised healthy and active communities and had adopted high-level policies broadly aligned with evidence-based recommendations. However, the lack of more nuanced, evidence-based policies may impede progress towards achieving these aspirations. Future research is required to examine council policies more closely.

Practical implications:
Australian councils need to comprehensively adopt evidence-based policies to support active communities.

Funding:
This research received no funding.

Additional Authors

Name: Anthony Kimpton
Affiliation: School of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no
Name: Paula Grant
Affiliation: School of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no
Name: Tracy Kolbe-Alexander
Affiliation: School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland
Presenting Author: no

Delegate Media Consent

ISPAH respects your privacy and is committed to using event photographs and videos responsibly. We capture media to showcase the value of our activities through various channels, such as our website, social media, and newsletters. Please review the consent details below, with the option to opt out at any time. If you would like to know more about how ISPAH responsibly manages your privacy please view our Privacy Statement.

Purpose: ISPAH would like to capture photographs and videos during the workshops for promotional and communication purposes, including sharing content on our website, social media, newsletters, and other related materials.

Usage:

  • Photographs and videos may be edited and used in ISPAH publications, promotional materials, and online.
  • Your personal details (e.g., name, affiliation) will not be shared unless explicitly consented to in a separate agreement.

Opt-Out Option: You have the right to opt out at any time. Please notify the photographer or videographer at the event, and we will ensure that no images or videos of you are used

Confirmation *