Re-imagining methods to evaluate a systems approach to improving physical activity, We Can Move.


Oral

Abstract Overview

Background: We Can Move (WCM) is a large systems approach that works with local communities and organisations to improve the physical activity environments across Gloucestershire, England.

Purpose: Evaluating such a complex approach is challenging. Here, we aim to bring to life a selection of innovative methods used to understand how WCM influenced the physical activity system.

Methods: Nine participatory systems mapping (PSM) workshops were carried out with 100 stakeholders to understand the factors influencing population level physical activity. Social Network Analysis (SNA) determined which stakeholders, and organisations, were engaged in WCM over time (n=2599). Lastly, 15 Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) workshops were conducted with 25 stakeholders to explore how WCM impacted the physical activity system. Findings were triangulated, centred around the systems map.

Results: The WCM systems map included 198 factors spanning 12 themes, from school and workplace influences, to physical activity opportunities, to political and systems leadership. The SNA identified that most stakeholders were able to influence physical activity opportunities (45%) and the school environment (22%). Those categorised as “co-owners” were predominantly seen to influence the political and systems leadership theme. These findings were largely mirrored through the REM analyses, indicating that some areas of the system, such as the workplace and transportation options, were yet to be substantially targeted.
Conclusions: The evaluation of WCM provided a noteworthy opportunity to test, develop, and triangulate a series of innovative methods, the findings from which enabled a comprehensive and nuanced understanding for how this complex systems approach functioned.

Practical implications: The triangulation of PSM, SNA, and REM provided detailed insight around system functioning, enabling future intervention and policy modification.

Funding: The evaluation of WCM was commissioned by Active Gloucestershire and supported by the NIHR ARC West.

Additional Authors

Name: Alan Inman-Ward
Affiliation: Active Gloucestershire
Presenting Author: no
Name: Tom Beasley
Affiliation: Active Gloucestershire
Presenting Author: no
Name: Kirsty Dunleavy-Harris
Affiliation: Active Gloucestershire
Presenting Author: no
Name: Sabi Redwood
Affiliation: University of Bristol
Presenting Author: no
Name: Russ Jago
Affiliation: University of Bristol
Presenting Author: no
Name: Charlie Foster
Affiliation: University of Bristol
Presenting Author: no

Delegate Media Consent

ISPAH respects your privacy and is committed to using event photographs and videos responsibly. We capture media to showcase the value of our activities through various channels, such as our website, social media, and newsletters. Please review the consent details below, with the option to opt out at any time. If you would like to know more about how ISPAH responsibly manages your privacy please view our Privacy Statement.

Purpose: ISPAH would like to capture photographs and videos during the workshops for promotional and communication purposes, including sharing content on our website, social media, newsletters, and other related materials.

Usage:

  • Photographs and videos may be edited and used in ISPAH publications, promotional materials, and online.
  • Your personal details (e.g., name, affiliation) will not be shared unless explicitly consented to in a separate agreement.

Opt-Out Option: You have the right to opt out at any time. Please notify the photographer or videographer at the event, and we will ensure that no images or videos of you are used

Confirmation *